Back to Events listing

Pensions

BRITISH AIRWAYS V APSPTL: The limits of trustee decision making

Tuesday 17 July 2018
6.30pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks and canapés
David Lloyd George Room, The Law Society, 113 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1PL
1.0 CPD

On 5 July 2018, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the long-running dispute between BA and the trustee of its Airways Pension Scheme (“APS”). BA’s appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Morgan was successful. The majority of the Court of Appeal (Lewison and Peter Jackson LJJ) agreed with BA that the Trustee had acted for an improper purpose in exercising a power of amendment to confer on itself a power to grant discretionary pension increases and exercising that power to grant an increase of 0.2% on pensions at a time when APS was in deficit (and against BA’s wishes). The majority made clear that the role of the pension scheme trustees was to administer the employer’s scheme, and not to take on the role of “paymaster”, by deciding what benefits pensioners should receive.

On 17 July 2018, Michael Tennet QC and Michael Ashdown, who appeared for the successful appellant, will be giving a concise and practical exposition of the case, its implications for Trustee decision making in relation to both unilateral and bilateral powers, and for the relationship between Trustees and Employers more generally.

Please note, this event is free of charge to attend and spaces will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis.

Please email seminars@wilberforce.co.uk to confirm your place.

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    Public sector pension schemes

    In the most recent article published on Paul Newman KC‘s website, James McCreath considers whether authorities administering public sector schemes are trustees, fiduciaries or just public servants. This article was first published on Paul’s website pensionsbarrister.com To read ‘Public sector pension schemes’ please click... Read more

    By James McCreath | Paul Newman KC
    Thursday 23 February 2023

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Repocussions? Legal claims arising out the liquidity crisis

    Paul Newman KC looks at leveraged LDIs and repo contracts, the statutory prohibition on borrowing and potential misselling claims in this article. This article was first published on Paul’s website pensionsbarrister.com Read “Repocussions? Legal claims arising out of the liquidity... Read more

    By Paul Newman KC
    Thursday 16 February 2023

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Articles

    Honda v Mercer

    Edward Sawyer discusses the recent decision in Honda v Mercer and comments on getting round the 15-year longstop in negligence claims. This article was first published on PensionsBarrister.com Click here to view the full article

    By Edward Sawyer
    Thursday 26 January 2023

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Articles

    Forfeiture and “6 year, no claim” provisions: Part 2

    In the second part of this two-part article, Thomas Seymour and Hugh Gittins of Slaughter & May consider some thorny issues and points for practitioners. This article was first published on PensionsBarrister.com Click here to view the full article

    By Thomas Seymour
    Monday 23 January 2023

    View more

View all thought leadership