In the matter of the Mitchells & Butlers Pension Plan [2021]
A major rectification claim being brought by a Trustee against the Employer on behalf of members. A three-week trial about the rate of pension increases for thousands of members.
Pensions
At Wilberforce Chambers, we are leading the way in the field of occupational pensions. We are market leaders with pre-eminent practitioners who specialise in all aspects of pensions law and pensions litigation. Over the past thirty years, our members have appeared in almost all the leading cases in this area. As a result, we can offer a wealth of resources and experience, with experts at all levels of seniority. This expertise has been widely acknowledged; Wilberforce Chambers is consistently singled out as the market leader by the premier independent researchers at Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500.
As well as top-quality advice and first-class innovative thinking, clients can expect Wilberforce’s down-to-earth, straightforward and fantastically user-friendly service. We pride ourselves on a practical approach to the needs of employers and trustees, who want commercially realistic and cost effective solutions. We deal with the largest pension litigation worth billions of pounds down to individual disputes and complaints before the Pensions Ombudsman. Our members combine in-depth knowledge of trusts law and technical pensions legislation with expertise in the related fields of regulatory, financial services, insolvency, tax, negligence, employment, equality, European and public law that affect pensions.
Every year, Wilberforce hosts the Edward Nugee Memorial Lectures, a series of talks by pension law practitioners on current topics of particular interest.
All of our previous papers can be found here, a year after their initial publication. In 2020 and 2021, our lectures were delivered as webinars and can be viewed on our YouTube channel here.
We advise on cutting-edge issues and litigation affecting pension schemes and their sponsoring employers, as well as emerging issues in the field of personal pensions. Recent examples include:
We get involved in disputes in a range of arenas, from the High Court and appellate Courts (including in Europe) through to the Pensions Regulator Determinations Panel and Upper Tribunal and the Pensions Ombudsman, and we deal with any related professional negligence issues.
Rankings and recognition
Wilberforce is ranked as a tier 1 set in the pensions categories of both Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500.
Chambers & Partners 2023: Wilberforce Chambers is a distinguished set, with a market-leading group of both silks and juniors, capable of handling the full spectrum of pensions work. Members are thoroughly experienced in handling large-scale, high-profile cases at the forefront of the pensions industry. Wilberforce barristers are equipped for advice and advocacy in relation to a host of regulatory matters and act for employers, trustees and the Pensions Regulator. The set is able to act in complex cases with elements of employment, trusts and tax law. In the past year, members of the set have been acting for the trustees of the Railways Pension Scheme in a case concerning the interaction of the scheme’s Protection Order and Section Rules. Wilberforce Chambers has also been representing Mitchells & Butler Pensions Plan in a rectification claim brought against the employer.
The Legal 500 2023: ‘Pensions power-house’ Wilberforce Chambers has a plethora of counsel at varying levels of experience to support clients on the most significant matters in the market, be they contentious or advisory. In the complex and high-value case of the Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund, Michael Tennet KC has been acting the representative beneficiaries in Part 8 proceedings, with other members of chambers involved in various capacities. Brian Green KC is a regular at the highest levels of court proceedings in pensions law, while Edward Sawyer continues to stand out for his exceptional practice as a junior, including acting against silk opposition in the Lloyds Pension Scheme litigation. ‘Very calm, authoritative’ junior Jennifer Seaman further strengthened Wilberforce’s bench in this area, joining the set in February 2022 from Outer Temple Chambers.
Publications
Among our members, we count esteemed authors and editors of leading pensions law textbooks:
A major rectification claim being brought by a Trustee against the Employer on behalf of members. A three-week trial about the rate of pension increases for thousands of members.
A leading Court of Appeal case on the proper approach to interpreting pension scheme documents, particularly when dealing with pension increase rules.
Raises far-reaching issues of pensions law and limitation law in context of £3m-£10m of unpaid pension benefits. Two-week High Court trial in March 2021, of which the 88-page judgment will affect all members of trust based schemes owed arrears.
The Court of Appeal confirmed unanimously that the introduction of s.62 of the Pensions Act 1995 was a domestic law measure that closed the Barber window with effect from 1 January 1996.
The first pension rectification claim decided after a full trial since the landmark decision of FSHC Group Holdings Ltd v GLAS Trust Corp Ltd.
Two recent cases: a Court of Appeal decision on the continued appropriateness of using RPI to increase pensions, and judicial review of the Treasury’s decision to extend full indexation to public service pension scheme members.
A landmark case confirming that there is an obligation to equalise benefits to take account of unequal Guaranteed Minimum Pensions. One of The Lawyer’s ‘Top 20 Cases of 2018’.
A ruling from the Supreme Court on the proper approach to interpreting pension scheme documents and switching from RPI pension increases
The well publicised case of the Pensions Regulator’s action in relation to the collapse of the BHS business and the related £400m pensions shortfall.
Major litigation involving the validity of the decision by trustees to award above-inflation pension increases.
Concerning the limits of the Pension Regulator’s FSD regime and the first FSD case to be determined by the courts.
Concerning whether the employer’s duty of good faith had been breached by the closure of a pension scheme and remedies for the breach.
Concerning the regard that a trustee should have for the interests of employers in exercising its powers under a pension scheme.

Articles
In the most recent article published on Paul Newman KC‘s website, James McCreath considers whether authorities administering public sector schemes are trustees, fiduciaries or just public servants. This article was first published on Paul’s website pensionsbarrister.com To read ‘Public sector pension schemes’ please click... Read more
By James McCreath | Paul Newman KC
Thursday 23 February 2023

Articles
Paul Newman KC looks at leveraged LDIs and repo contracts, the statutory prohibition on borrowing and potential misselling claims in this article. This article was first published on Paul’s website pensionsbarrister.com Read “Repocussions? Legal claims arising out of the liquidity... Read more
By Paul Newman KC
Thursday 16 February 2023

Articles
Edward Sawyer discusses the recent decision in Honda v Mercer and comments on getting round the 15-year longstop in negligence claims. This article was first published on PensionsBarrister.com Click here to view the full article
By Edward Sawyer
Thursday 26 January 2023

Articles
In the second part of this two-part article, Thomas Seymour and Hugh Gittins of Slaughter & May consider some thorny issues and points for practitioners. This article was first published on PensionsBarrister.com Click here to view the full article
By Thomas Seymour
Monday 23 January 2023
Barristers: KCs
Barristers: Juniors